Friday, December 23, 2011

COMMENTS ON RON PAUL

Ron Paul - like Obama?

The 'very Jewish' columnist Melanie Phillips writes in the UK's Daily Mail:

"The really striking thing is the symmetry between Ron Paul and Barack Obama.

"Both are isolationists; both blame America for the terrorist war being waged against it... both take positions antithetical to the survival of America’s sole ally in the Middle East, the State of Israel."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2077660/The-symmetry-Ron-Paul-Obama-fearful-Gingrich-better.html#ixzz1hKuogibU

Melanie fails to mention Obama's CIA connections and Obama's attacks on Moslem countries such as Egypt, Syria and Pakistan.

We hope that Ron Paul is not another Obama.

"Obama lied about closing Guantanamo Bay. He lied about bringing the troops home. He re-signed the Patriot Act after saying that he would would not. Furthermore, Obama is targeting American citizens for assassination without due process..." (Ron Paul Should Be The Next President Of The United States - Forbes )

Yes, an article in Forbes supports Ron Paul.

Things are not always what they seem. TURKEY'S ERDOGAN IS JEWISH?

Here are extracts from some of the comments on "IOWA - LAUGHINGSTOCK OF THE COUNTRY".

Anonymous said...

This post seems contradictory.

On the one hand:

A neocon, Israeli firster, Jennifer Rubin, denounces Ron Paul; that should tell you something.

On the other hand:

Criticism of Paul's position on Sound Money.

I don't think a gold standard would be practical, but the underlining principle is Sound Money to avoid hyper-inflation.

Since 1913, when the Fed was created, the Dollar has decreased in value by 96% (that's a lot of inflation).

Ron Paul's main issue is to tackle the Federal Reserve System (private international bankers, who control the money supply).

The super rich are the ones who benefit from high inflation, as opposed to those on fixed incomes (retirees) and low incomes.

Huge amounts of credit (debt) is provided for the super rich to invest and buy up assets. Wealth is concentrated in the top 1%.

Or credit (debt) is extended to countries that can never repay the debt and in turn sign over natural resources and/or physical assets, or provide military bases, or set up laws favorable for foreign investors, which allow them to gain control of the most profitable parts of the economy, see Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins.

But with the creation of money "out of thin air" exceeding growth in the economy, inflation is the result.

Also, inflation is one way the Middle Class is reduced (the other way is outsourcing & offshoring).
Ron Paul stands against "inflation for the rich".

Ron Paul supports the idea that Sound Money will spur economic growth distributed up & down the economic ladder.

Khomeini - Mad Moslem or MI6 spy?

Mixed in are issues surrounding Ronald Reagan's condoning homosexuals in his administrations (both state & federal). What does that have to do with Ron Paul?

A number of Republicans supported Ronald Reagan.

The alternative was incumbent President Jimmy Carter, who had substantial backing from the Trilateral Commission (Carter was a member) founded by David Rockefeller.

Carter (Trilateral Commission?) policy caused stag-flation (inflation without economic growth). Reagan policy helped break the stag-flation cycle.

David Rockefeller supports 'one world government' and is a Bilderberg member (elite power group).

The Republican establishment backed George H. W. Bush in the nomination race against Reagan in 1980.

George H. W. Bush pushed for, quote, "a New World Order".

My perception is that Aangirfan is based in the United Kingdom (I could be wrong).

Perhaps, Aangirfan's understanding of American politics is incomplete.

At this point in time, Ron Paul is the best bet to stop this elite drive for a New World Order.

Aangirfan, I've been reading your website for a while (starting around the beginning of the so-called "Arab Spring"). I've learned quite a bit, including that the "Arab Spring" was not what it seemed.

But this post seems a bit on the nihilistic side.

Who else (who has a realistic chance to win) would stop this drive to U. S. would-wide hegemony?

Aangirfan, please research Ron Paul's foreign policy positions.

Please research Ron Paul's criticisms of the C.I.A. and secret U.S. foreign policy.

Ron Paul is honest and has integrity,

Ron Paul supports the U. S. Constitution and limited government (which is what the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect, along with individual rights).

For anybody who stands against the New World Order and other Globalist plans, Ron Paul is the candidate.

And for those in other countries, if you are not in favor of current U.S. foreign policy, Ron Paul is the candidate you should hope gets the Republican nomination and then wins the presidency.

The elite establishment of BOTH American political parties, Democratic & Republican, are against Ron Paul because he threatens to turn over their status quo apple cart.

What does that tell you?

Ron Paul with one of the bad guys.

Anonymous said...

Jeffifer Rubin quoted a Ron Paul newsletter: "In 1990, the newsletter cast aspersions on the 'tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise.'"

Aangirfan: Doesn't this match up with your own personal research?

Yes, it could be slightly exagerated, but the idea that there are many people, mostly Zionists, who help and/or work for Mossad, has substantial evidence to back it up.

Rich Lowery in another "hit piece", quoted Ron Paul: "In January 2010, he [Paul] declared: 'There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military.'"

Again, Aangirfan, doesn't this match up with your research?

Yes, it could be exagerated, but look at Operation Gladio and Libya, and, now, Syria, and a whole string of countries where the CIA toppled or tried to topple the government.

What about the CIA drone campaign in Pakistan? What about evidence that the CIA has been attempting to destablize or even break-up Pakistan?

Ron Paul is right on foreign policy.

Diplomacy and trade with other nations.

Military interventionism, no

Things are not always what they seem.

aferrismoon said...

Words chosen with a good amount of tongue-in-cheek?

'a nest of homosexuals at top levels of the Reagan administration may have been penetrated by Soviet-backed espionage agents posing as male prostitutes.'

'penetrated by Soviet-backed espionage agents the young farmboys hopped on their tractors and chugged off .....' :)

On a more serious not 'penetrating' US politics just before the wall came down seems either lucky or very well planned. One might imagine that the Sov regime penetrated both Dems and Reps.

Israel [for a while ] were aligned with the 'communist' states and then inexplicably turned to the US, beginning the slow but sure Israel-first totalitarianism.

cheers

Anonymous said...

Excellent synopsis, Aangirfan, nice summation of a viper's nest.

Everytime that I see a picture of Reagan, it reminds me of the Michael Jackson picture taken at the White House where Michael is standing between Ronald and Nancy who both look like they were having 'words'.

Somehow, I think Michael was ensnared in the vipers' nest.

A. Peasant said...

RP is the garbage man for the bankers.

His job is to get the fed out of the way so they can replace it and start fresh.


Ron Paul "believes the United States should shed its role as the world’s policeman and focus instead on its internal economic problems.

"Representative Ron Paul of Texas says he would cut a trillion dollars out of the federal budget his first year as president, in part by ending all foreign wars and foreign aid, including to Israel."

Ron Paul's foreign policy views draw support.


We have previously pointed out that Ron Paul was once a fan of Ronald Reagan.

'Michael'', in a comment on this blog, points out that Ron Paul has criticised Ronald Reagan:

Flashback 1987: Ron Paul Trashes Ronald Reagan Pensito Review

Letter written by Ron Paul:

"President Reagan... failed to exercise his constitutional responsibility to veto spending.

"Instead, he has encouraged it...

"America will suffer from a Reaganomics that is nothing but warmed-over Keynesianism...

"Reagan ... reneged ... on his pledge to abolish the Departments of Education and Energy, or to work against abortion...

"Knowing this administration’s record, I wasn’t surprised by its Libyan disinformation campaign, Israeli-Iranian arms-for-hostages swap, or illegal funding of the Contras."

Ron Paul's mentor Murray Rothbard on "the myth of criminal Reagan being conservative."

http://mises.org/daily/1544

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard60.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard54.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard49.html

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Khomeini - Mad Moslem or MI6 spy?

By the end, a little of both. But at the start and during the operational phase getting into power, the best evidence is MI6 spy.

But give the guy credit -- to maintain his assumed persona for so long took incredible discipline.

Don't get me wrong, the U.S., Britain, and France were behind the 1979 Iranian Revolution -- it wouldn't have happened without them.

And it was wrong.

It set the model for a lot of what is going on now in the Arab Spring.

Still, that Khomeini face speaks steely determination.

Perhaps, that is why the British Empire was, for a time, successful.

Because of men like that.

Such are tyrants made.

dognamedblue said...

hey aang any info on the recent bombings in iraq & syria? both, to me at least, stink of anglo/american black ops in their timing & targets [I don't do politics, any politician, no matter what they claim, are just puppets, as always follow the money ;) ]

Anonymous said...

1)-New World Order has various factions vying for power and control.
2)-Implosion of captialism which means we are witnessing a vicious global dogfight to 'control' new monetary system (which includes City of London banks). Hear Ron Paul statments.
3)-Ron Paul platform 'abolish the federal reserve'
4)-Soros is thought to fund Occupy Wall street movements. Occupy is merely a method to use people as a means to undermine econmomies/ideologies of targeted countries. See 'political/actisism section' in wiki Soros link.
5)-Soros believes there should be new world (financial) order.
6)-Any presidency candidates are a Bilderberg wanna-bees. Ron Paul is just a political drone using similar 'Occupy' ideologies to generate civil unrest to undermine USA. Soros paid MILLIONS to destory Bush. Now, same thing with Ron Paul to destroy Obama. USA presidency is a gladiator fight of freemason drones.
7)-Ron Paul's political campaign is thought to be funded by George Soros new world order faction.
8)-Ron Paul is a Freemason


1)-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nrWmMTMwv8
2)-http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/soros-the-world-does-need-order/
3)-http://www.rense.com/general75/aabol.htm
4)-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros
5)-http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/soros-the-world-does-need-order/
6)-http://12160.info/page/watch-ron-paul-on-the-tonight-show-w-jay-leno-nbc
7)-http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071227062822AAdGnx0
8)-http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/ron-paul-and-freemasonry/

Cheers to us!

Anonymous said...

off-topic but related to despicable vicious USA political dogfight. Failed political candidate used Facebook rant to call for 'assassination of n****r (Obama) and his daughters'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/20/jules-manson-obama_n_1161044.html?ref=mostpopular

Anonymous said...

(7) "Ron Paul's political campaign is thought to be funded by George Soros new world order faction."

Please, this isn't a source, this is a message board asking the question: "Is any George Soros or MoveOn.org money funding Ron Paul?", with responses mostly opining, no, in various ways.

So, you wonder if the author's motive is misdirection with the rest of his copy.

Anonymous said...

@Anon 7:55: '...So, you wonder if the author's motive is misdirection with the rest of his copy".

7) "Ron Paul's political campaign is thought to be funded by George Soros new world order faction."

'...thought to be funded ...' was the operative phraseology used with the hopes that a reader might offer some insight into the net chatter about Soros.

I did some reading and independantly connected a few dots offering them an as a possible explanation for recent geo-political events. If you consider that misdirection, then read someone else's comments if you are looking to be spoon-fed.

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul asks this question, sometimes during Republican candidate debates: 'How would you like another country to invade and bomb the United States, destroy our country?' That question and the only intelligent answer is the basis for a civil (and effective) foreign policy.

We are cursed, truly, when one of the most important statements of our current period comes from someone who is otherwise a goofball.

A newsletter with Paul's name in the title ran for years spouting the most offensive racism. Paul denies knowledge of it, making him a self-admitted fool.

Paul's policies on government are also inherently limited. We have a deadly combination of pollution and climate change that requires high level coordination and methods of enforcing cooperation. Paul's Libertarian "let the markets take care of it" policies will get us all killed.

Paul caucuses with the Republican Party. That's not necessary unless you run as one, which he does. That belies his various constitutionalist positions (which are often outstanding).

I'm grateful for the comments on foreign invasions and aware of the other positions I mentioned, sufficiently aware to not take Paul seriously as a contender for anything other than what he is right now.

We at the seedy end of our avenue of lost dreams, a time when someone like Paul is actually admirable in some ways.

Anonymous said...

hey, who drew that picture? i say that bc ive seen it elsewhere and i think someone might be taking credit for it....

 
Site Meter